Review a batch record and investigate a hardness deviation
You are the Production Supervisor in the compression suite at Western Sydney.
What has happened
Batch WS-26-0412, paracetamol 500 milligram tablets for a contract customer, was stopped at hour three of compression when an in process tablet hardness result fell outside the limit in the batch manufacturing record. The batch is on hold, a deviation has been raised and engineering is checking the compression force sensor on tablet press 1. The batch record contains the dispensing, granulation, drying, blending and compression steps with second person verification. Rohan Mehta needs the production review completed, every finding listed, the deviation assessed and an investigation drafted with the data needed to decide whether the batch can be released, reworked or rejected. The customer expects a position by Friday.
Deliverables
- Production review findings list
- Draft deviation investigation
- Updated register and batch record entries
- Briefing for the site manager and customer
Documents to use
Systems to use
Production Batch Records
Every food, beverage and pharmaceutical batch from planning to release, with line, quantity, status and the notes that support release.
Non-conformance and CAPA Register
Register of every non-conformance, deviation, complaint and safety incident with investigation, corrective and preventive action and closure status.
Maintenance and Calibration Requests
Breakdown, preventive, calibration and hygienic design requests on plant and instruments at all three sites.
Units of competency
Current on training.gov.au for the Food, Beverage and Pharmaceutical as at 10 September 2026.
FBPPHM4001Monitor and maintain Good Manufacturing Practice requirementsFBPPHM4002Prepare and review workplace documentation to support Good Manufacturing Practice requirementsFBPPHM4006Respond to non-conformanceFBPPHM4004Participate in change control proceduresQualifications
FBP40522Certificate IV in Pharmaceutical ManufacturingWhat to look for
Evidence guide
Look for a systematic review that catches documentation findings as well as the hardness result, a trend analysis rather than a single data point, root cause options that connect process data to the result, and a clear separation between what is established and what is still open. The briefing must not promise a disposition before the data supports it.